Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Everton Rumours Member Posts
Bluupaul's Profile
Correct Score Competition:
Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:
Not played Flat Out Racing
Not played Flat Out Racing
No Profile Picture uploaded
Team: Where from: Favourite player: Best team moment: Interests: Timezone: |
Bluupaul's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Bluupaul's Posts
To Bluupaul's last 5 rumours posts
To Bluupaul's last 5 banter posts
To Bluupaul's last 5 rumour replies
To Bluupaul's last 5 banter replies
Bluupaul's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Bluupaul's rumours posts
21 Feb 2016 13:09:45
strange how howard was number 1 keeper and robles the cup keeper but now robles is number 1 howard deemed not good enough for the cup. that's tells me that robbie agreed tim was crap but didint like anyone telling him so then when tim got injured robbie got the perfect excuse to keep robles in goal and it looks likes it was all his idea all along.
1.) 16 Feb 2016 21:42:24
Think as our club captain he has every right to give an opinion. don't believe for one minute that refs hold grudges against certain teams, its financially not worth it to them, it's more a case of them just not being very good. If we are good enough we will win, simple as that. To call our captain a muppet is an insult to him and the club. Supporter?
2.) 16 Feb 2016 21:44:19
come ed. scrutinized by an observer are you serious,these observers are a bunch of idiots they stick together and do nothing just like the fa who let berhino off for the stamp on macarthy they make excuses and get their storys right to protect their bezzy mates and then it all goes away these obsevers you mention are the same observers who saw the sterling cross that was out and the throw in that was giving to city because we never took our throw quick enough was there nothing done about that so we get the same ref again this week it stinks.
{Ed025's Note - your very cynical paul, there is not a conspiracy against everton mate, decisions go for and against and i know we have had some bad luck at times but thats just the way it goes im afraid..
3.) 16 Feb 2016 22:24:33
So according to you bluupaul Jags mustn't comment on a ref that directly insulted him during a match. But you, who hasn't been insulted think it's ok to call Jags a stupid muppet cretin. Is there any chance that you could be one or even all of these yourself?
4.) 16 Feb 2016 23:17:39
Or the same observers who didn't see the Stones penalty on Sterling? You are very blinkered my friend. All clubs get bad calls, that's just how it is. One ref and 22 athletes playing a high tempo game, where decisions have to be made in an instant. Some they get wrong, but most they get right IMO.
5.) 16 Feb 2016 23:19:47
This mans incompetence cost the club the game at city, far from keeping quiet, the club should have been raising holy hell about his performance at city, and his appointment to this match. The man should be serving a ban for that performance, and his comments, if he where a player, he would have been facing a charge of bringing the game into disrepute.
6.) 17 Feb 2016 07:56:56
Alex Ferguson was a master stroke at pre match mind games, he's letting Atkinson know he dropped a bollock in the cup game, he will think twice about giving anything dodgy against us with all eyes on him, let just hope Jags doesn't lunge into a tackle too early.
7.) 17 Feb 2016 08:42:57
Atkinson shouldn't be refereeing high profile games till he realises the rules concerning throw in. oliver never gave us a throw in last saturday for all west broms time wasteing. maybe he would have given a penalty for fosters time wasteing. Jags doesn't deserve the reaction goven from his comments.
8.) 17 Feb 2016 09:11:51
In my opinion, public criticism of referees performance good or bad should be from club officials and not players, That is from the manager.
9.) 17 Feb 2016 08:42:57
Atkinson shouldn't be refereeing high profile games till he realises the rules concerning throw in. oliver never gave us a throw in last saturday for all west broms time wasteing. maybe he would have given a penalty for fosters time wasteing. Jags doesn't deserve the reaction goven from his comments.
29 Jan 2016 17:35:32
just seen the shocking footage of everton fan being punched in the face and head he was on his own but it was a free for all punching competiton and the speed of the stewards to stop it was snail like no rushing or jumping in it was a joke. mind you wot do you exspect from mancs dead hard in a group cowards on there own. COWARDS. THAT SAID HE SHOULD NOT AV BEEN THERE ON HIS OWN SILLY MAN.
1.) 29 Jan 2016 18:16:46
Also Paul did you see the digs they threw he could have just stayed mate they were all proper farts who couldn't fight there way out of a bath of beans.
2.) 29 Jan 2016 20:19:54
ye right liam I actually think they were girls throwing them punches but dressed up like lads. that's manc girls for ye.
Bluupaul's banter posts with other poster's replies to Bluupaul's banter posts
10 Apr 2016 11:39:54
not evrton related. but have you seen nasri"s hair style. OH MY GOD ITS THE PHILL NEVILLE SYDROME. julian clarey and nasri seperated at birth.
1.) 10 Apr 2016 14:17:41
i didn't know who it was for a while mate, what a tool.
27 Feb 2016 18:25:17
i feel a harry enfield moment coming on. hear it goes. liverpool I do believe we are consideribly richer than you. this is the first time in many a year that I as an everton fan can start gloating and it feels weird but bloody brilliant and in no way can any body begrudge us that.
{Ed002's Note - I truly believe that you have no grasp of what has happened at all.}
1.) 27 Feb 2016 18:49:01
Ed002 if you have more of an idea than the rest of us can you please explain. Cheers.
{Ed002's Note - There is nothing to explain. You need to actually understand what has happened and some posters need to get over their inability to grasp even the basic fundamentals of football finances - for example, all of this "richer than you" BS. On most club pages we simply do not discuss finances - and that is certainly going to be the case for this page as well.}
2.) 27 Feb 2016 18:52:50
Ed what's up you appear very negative on news?
{Ed002's Note - It is not negative but for reasons that are beyond me a number of posters seem to be under the impression that the £100M or whatever the figure invested in shares is will be being spent on players. That is not true and it really doesn't work like that. The brain-dead comment aimed at Liverpool fans about Everton being "richer" is simply nonsense. What Everton has is a new investor who will be good for the club. Additional investment for players will be available but it won't be any vast spending spree. If Everton wish to do that there is due process to follow for "new investment" if the club want to avoid sanctions. But timing of doing that is critical. As I previously explained, the deal with John Jay Moores and Charles Noell was struggling after several meetings regarding a new stadium. That is where I would now expect to see Everton really benefit. Moshiri will look to grow the value of his investment and will put people in place and a structure that will seek sponsorship and will look to exploit financial opportunities within the English game.}
3.) 27 Feb 2016 18:54:57
Ed002 that just made me nearly spit my chicken dinner out in laughter. This guys roughly on a par with Henry's wealth so I guess it depends how much he's willing to pump into the club if anything. Certainly doesn't mean our bank balance has just gone up by a billion, still a very welcome step in the right direction.
{Ed002's Note - What has the value of Henry's wealth got to do with Moshiri? What would be the combined wealth of the Liverpool owners - not Henry? And what relevance will taht be. What has the value of Moshiri's wealth got to do with anything? This is what I mean by your not understanding the finances.
These are portfolio investments.}
4.) 27 Feb 2016 19:08:48
I to am not interested in any other Club, why people feel the need on their Team's board to discuss other than their own is beyond me. On the investment front it is good and bad news, good because it gives us considerable clout and keeps BK on and the bad bit is because BK is still there the fraud will keep his job. 12th at the moment.
5.) 27 Feb 2016 19:18:45
Come on lads calm down yes we got good news today but let's see how it plays out and our plans are come on we are Evertonians and let's not forget that no abuse or slagging lads discuss it.
6.) 27 Feb 2016 19:28:05
Ed no offense but if people want to talk about clubs money they should be able to. We talk about clubs going under so now we're excited it gets turned like this.
{Ed002's Note - There is no point in discussing money or finances when the vast majority struggle to understand them It leads to misunderstands, rows etc..}
7.) 27 Feb 2016 19:29:00
I understand what you are saying ed002 and agree that this doesn't make Everton richer than anybody as you said this guy may choose to substantially invest money into the squad or stadium but business is business and he will definitely be doing so in order to make the team more financially viable to strengthen his investment in the club. Either way we will have more investment than we have in the past and a lot of supporters are just very excited at the prospect of our beloved club hopefully being able to compete more on a financial level than we have done in the past.
{Ed002's Note - He will do it in a managed and professional manner. There is no other way to do it without very significant risk. The whole issue is that it needs a structure and organization that will seek out commercial opportunities, sponsorship and partners. So think of it as now having new blood and a fresh approach rather than what some clubs crave - a nice sugar-daddy owner like Thaksin Shinawatra? How about Sheikh Al Thani? Or Sulaiman Al Fahim?}
8.) 27 Feb 2016 19:29:07
hole on let me just see what it says at the top of this page. Oh yes Everton banter! That's all it is ed a bit banter! Of course some of us will be spouting off to our Liverpool supporting mates saying we are richer! So what if it's true or not it's just banter between fans! You take things far too seriously ed!
{Ed002's Note - If you are not interested in my explaining anything to you in a clear and correct fashion so you are well informed then it may be best I leave the Everton page to the shaven-headed, lager-swilling, pot-bellied, tattooed, knuckle-dragging oafs to share all of the misinformation that you seem so keen on.
Perhaps when you are sharing the BS with your Liverpool supporting chums you should hope that they are as ill-informed as you as the truth would simply be embarrassing.}
9.) 27 Feb 2016 19:36:19
I understand what your saying Ed002. Its abit like me being a billionaire but only purchasing 5-10% shares of EFC. That doesn't mean huge spending sprees of that the club instantly becomes one of the richest. i'm might be wrong Ed but that's what I get from the whole thing.
{Ed002's Note - If you were to buy 10% of the shares in Everton, the money you have invested goes to whoever you purchased the shares from - not the club. The value of Everton remains unchanged.
If Microsoft's Bill Gates were to buy 10% of the shares in Everton, the money he has invested goes to whoever he purchased the shares from - not the club. The value of Everton remains unchanged.
What Everton gets out of this is an Iranian born, Monaco-based businessman with a great deal of experience. He will look to grow his investment and the value of teh club and will no doubt invest some money hiself as he creates a structure to facility commercial exploitation. He is keen but will not be working full time for the club - but other will come in.}
10.) 27 Feb 2016 19:50:29
Calm yourself down ed absolutely no need for any of this! I am not claiming to know anything about the financial side of things! And my BS with my Liverpool supporting chums is exactly that! We are having a laugh taking the mic, I love winding that lot up! That's part of being a supporter, having good banter with other supporters! I very much appreciate the info you give, but what's wrong with just being daft sometimes? Only live once and after all it's just a game,
{Ed002's Note - I am perfectly calm. You seems to be struggling with a lot of what has happened. However, knowing many of the Liverpool supporters from this site I rather doubt they will be able to embarrass you with the truth. My advice is to take something shiny along with you when you go to banterize them (or whatever it is you do). At least then you can distract them if they look like they are going to have a rejoinder.}
11.) 27 Feb 2016 19:59:16
Ah hey Ed that's a bit unfair to those of us who are shaven headed, lager swilling, pot bellied, tattoed, and are knuckle draggers calling us oafs. We do have feelings you know.
{Ed002's Note - Fair enough, I apologise to Ed025.}
12.) 27 Feb 2016 20:14:14
Wow! Exactly what am I struggling with ed? Yet again you seem to favour the insults? I have not insulted you once! all I'm saying is that people are excited and have been waiting for this for a long time! So what if we don't know the facts, or do know them but choose to jump on the "lets be irrational" bandwagon anyway, why are you so hell bent against people enjoying the moment? You are clearly a well educated person and that's great but that doesn't mean everyone else is stupid, once again this is a banter site!
{Ed002's Note - That is not an insult - that is all absolutely true. If you would rather not be informed of what any of this means, as others have been asking about, your best bet is to simply not read the posts. Or skip over any where I have had something to say.}
13.) 27 Feb 2016 20:42:35
you know a lot and I always read your posts with interest, so yes I want to know what's going on, but sometimes I like to forget about the serious side of things and just enjoy a moment of (for lack of a better word) stupidness, but it seems that whenever people do that, you jump in with your "you know nothing" comments, if this site was called "Everton facts and topical discussions" then I would be factual with my posts and would do research before posting, but as its not, and yet again I know I keep coming back to this but at the top it says banter (exchange remarks in a good-humoured teasing way) so that's what myself and most of us do.
27 Feb 2016 17:23:06
yeeeeeessssssss hahahahahahhah its a grand old team to play for a billionare hahahahah nwe players hahahah new ground hahahahaha jealouse red fans yeeeessss we can compete at last come ooooooonnnnnn coyb.
24 Feb 2016 22:48:23
watched city v keiv and I didint think much of lenko infact it was hard to know if he was playing or not he was poor he hardly sold himself to prospective buyers its a NO from me.
1.) 25 Feb 2016 08:51:11
He's just come back from injury and looked the biggest threat in a poor Kiev team to me.
20 Feb 2016 16:48:51
great to see the biggest anti football manager and his horrible team getting knocked out of the cup wba are everything football shouldint be boring & horrible.
27 Feb 2016 14:16:38
i"m not embarrased ed why would I be its not the crime of the centry to call them yanks instead of americans bleave me there are thousands of people who call americans yanks but you seem to take it personley has someone yanked your chain.
27 Feb 2016 13:54:10
naive why? and if you think that then so is every other blue who suggest it could someone else.oh ye and I meant americans.
{Ed002's Note - It is nothing to do with who it is. It is naive as your expectations are that vast amounts of money will be thrown at the club. If you meant Americans then you should say that and not embarrass yourself.
As I have previously explained the discussions held regarding the ground were a concern to the Americans.}
27 Feb 2016 10:03:43
i posted that a couple of days ago I av been getting bits of info off other sites and when I posted it the editor shot me down like I was in cuckoo land but it looks like the billionare owner we need is going to happen.the yanks are not billionares so would only take us so far but with the latest news we could take off.
{Ed002's Note - You are being incredibly naive I am afraid Paul. And I am not aware of any "yanks" ever showing any interest in buying Everton at all.}
16 Feb 2016 21:44:19
come ed. scrutinized by an observer are you serious,these observers are a bunch of idiots they stick together and do nothing just like the fa who let berhino off for the stamp on macarthy they make excuses and get their storys right to protect their bezzy mates and then it all goes away these obsevers you mention are the same observers who saw the sterling cross that was out and the throw in that was giving to city because we never took our throw quick enough was there nothing done about that so we get the same ref again this week it stinks.
{Ed025's Note - your very cynical paul, there is not a conspiracy against everton mate, decisions go for and against and i know we have had some bad luck at times but thats just the way it goes im afraid..
29 Jan 2016 20:19:54
ye right liam I actually think they were girls throwing them punches but dressed up like lads. that's manc girls for ye.
10 Apr 2016 12:05:15
45 if that's young. and if it was a young lad does that mean they no nothing tut tut.
10 Apr 2016 11:57:18
sunderlands league titles. not in the top leagu. 2 fa cups. come on how far back do you want to go. bolton 1923 wow that is far back and just bcos they had clough and lofthouse playing for them means nothing. I didint realise that if you had a good player in your team it counts as history. barnet had tony cottee and edger davids playing for them hmmm history yeah right.
10 Apr 2016 11:21:37
big deal. would you say the same if it was them lot across the road? I think not. me like lots of blues would take great delight in thier demise. oldest clubs in the league so what doesint mean they deserve my sympathy. as for stanley they survive on a shoe string so yes I would have sympathy for them as they have nothing but do their best. were as all the other no marks have or have had millions to spend but still manage to get themselves in a mess. so let me say it again. sunderland no history only their age,bolton no history only their age,newcastle no history only their age,villa lots of history but have been asking for it for years. narrow minde view NO ITS MY VEIW.
10 Apr 2016 10:29:08
sad why? bolton what's their history,sunderland no history and as for newcastle I could not be more delighted if they went down I cannot bare them,were is their history. they avin got any. not won a trophy since adam and eve and yet the geordies seem to think they should be somewhere were they have never been before. granted villa have a history but they have been asking for this for years and now they have got it. but sad no not me mate.
09 Apr 2016 21:45:09
i think he meant to say the CHAMPIONSHIP.