Everton Rumours Member Posts

 

atom blaster's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



atom blaster's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To atom blaster's Posts

 

 

To atom blaster's last 5 banter replies

 

atom blaster has no Rumours Posts

 

 

atom blaster has no Banter Posts

 

 

atom blaster has no Rumour Replies

 

 

atom blaster's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Feb 2020 14:48:52
Ed002 surely if we get sponsorship that is more in line with the top clubs i.e 40m p/ y for shirt sponsorship from somebody who doesn't own any part of the club officially then UEFA or the Premier League cannot charge us on the basis that it is not fair value. If the bigger clubs can have this sponsorship why can't we unless the goal of FFP is to preserve the status quo. Whilst this may be UEFAs agenda, in a court of law surely they would see it differently? if an outsider wants to sponsor Everton as much as other outsiders want to sponsor Manchester United then it has to be upto the individual or organisation to justify why they regard it as value not a football association. Perhaps Everton are living above their means at the moment as they are aware that new sponsorship/ stadium naming rights will kick in and boost the clubs income to a level that means current spending is within.

atom blaster

{Ed002's Note - If Everton get shirt sponsorship and it is reasonable then it will be allowed. But the probles are now - the wages are far too high, the new stadium will add £500M of debt, the club is making significant losses, the club is no mortgaged to a third party providing loans. It is being mismanaged in the extreme.}


 

 





Change Consent