13 May 2014 14:55:43
To all the Kenwright haters. You do know that all the money DOES NOT GO TO BILL Kenwright for example if Elstone has 10% of the share then he gets the 10% of 86 million and it is HIS choice to give the money to Everton Football Club or keep it for him self. And so on with other owners etc so if Bill Kenwright has the larger amount of the share let's say 30 % he gets 30 % of 86 million pounds and then decides the amount of money goes to Everton Football club from his share.

1.) 13 May 2014
I believe Bill will discuss to Martinez for budget and target before share to shareholder.

2.) 13 May 2014
13 May 2014 18:33:12
The same applies surely to running costs of the club then, that bill would only be accountable for his 30% share of costs. let's be sensible and consider not all monies into the club are not divided by shareholders but are invested into the business as it would in the business world. Shareholders then take a salary plus dividend from the club earnings as their income.

3.) 13 May 2014
Firstly Elstone is CEO he is an employee not a member of the board. Secondly any owner of the club could only get a dividends payout from profits not turnover. Why can't people understand that 86 million or whatever we get from tv money this year is not profit it is simply an increase in our turnover and therefore may relate to an increase in profits but not by 80 odd million, it's an increase in tv money by about 25?million which if out costs were comparable to last year means a profit increase from one million to 25-28 million not 80 odd as some seem to think, it's as if we never got money from sky before. Which if that was the case would have seen us bankrupt and non existent years ago

4.) 13 May 2014
Everton is a limited company and BK and other board members are the major shareholders. The idea that the board can just "divvy" up the money - other than by paying out a dividend (which I don't think they do) or pay themselves a salary or fees (which I don't think they do either) or pay themselves exorbitant expenses (which I think their do either) - seems ludicrous to me.
Maybe Bill Kenwright is expecting too much from potential investors - and is making our club too financially unattractive or is trying to retain control (and the chairmanship) - but IMHO his problem is merely that he's not Bill'ionaire' Kenwright.

5.) 13 May 2014
Text correction - it's a killer!
The comment about exorbitant expenses where my posting read "which I think their do either" should, of course, have read "which I don't think they do either").
I really should check my postings ;-)

6.) 17 May 2014
Wow. Only 2 words to summarise this doggerel. Unmitigated hogwash.