Everton Rumours Archive September 09 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us everton transfer rumours.

09 Sep 2016 01:13:23
Martinez, 10-11 mill pay off, he is one cheaky b. erd, he should be paying us for the damage he did, the man has no shame.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed025's Note - tell me about it JCW, nice reward for doing your job poorly..

09 Sep 2016 07:21:47
Think the man has a lot of gall. A "phenomenal" amount. Everton been screwed again by the fraud.

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Sep 2016 08:37:51
We never should reward him for that first season, he was only doing a job we had him contacted to do, so more fool Everton.

Agree3 Disagree0

09 Sep 2016 09:15:44
Who says crime doesn't pay? 😧 😲 🙄.

Agree3 Disagree0

09 Sep 2016 11:22:25
It is the blinkered approach of those that hired him (despite his league record saying otherwise) and then gave him a contract extension based on a first season blip rather than wait to see how the second season (commonsense) panned out, that should be blamed if anything. Can't blame the bloke for claiming based on the above. 10 Mill well spent in my opinion.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Sep 2016 11:47:28
'' (despite his league record saying otherwise) ''

Hopefully BCT, this has been a lesson learned and those responsible 🤓 should now don their 'dunces hats' and let more savvy types do the hiring!

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Sep 2016 13:52:32
Well actually it cost us a lot more than 10-11 million to get rid since we had to pay Southampton to get Koeman, about 5M if I recall correctly. So about 16M pounds to get rid of a failure. Hopefully Moshiri will stop this stupid waste of money.

Agree2 Disagree2

09 Sep 2016 14:49:51
plus £13.5 million on niasse.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Sep 2016 18:32:34
You could put a positive spin on it and say it cost is 16mill to get RK.

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Sep 2016 22:11:09
Could we not have given him Niasse to keep for himself?

Agree3 Disagree1

11 Sep 2016 10:25:09
A frustrating as it is, a contract is legal and binding and if Everton were silly enough to put a compensation package of that size in it, then RM is entitled to it, no matter how badly he may have performed. Our anger, in this instance, should not be directed at RM but those responsbile for negotiating the contract on behalf of the club.

Agree3 Disagree0

 
Change Consent