Everton Rumours Archive May 25 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us everton transfer rumours.

25 May 2016 22:39:34
The Guardian Reckon that Ryan Giggs is in the frame for the Everton Job.

Believable0 Unbelievable9

25 May 2016 23:03:05
Honestly, his first management gig can't be with us surely, it would be a massive gamble considering he hasn't got premier league management experience or any actual management experience for that matter. I remember when Brian Kidd kicked out on his own, people raves that if he was fergies no.2 he must be good. But we saw where all the talent was there.

Agree2 Disagree1

25 May 2016 23:34:55
I hope not, even if Giggs turned out to be a success for us we'd only be a stepping stone to him returning to Utd. I want a Mgr who's going to build a dynasty over the next decade or so. Pellegrin, Low and LVG are too old, Emery has a dodgy away record, FDB seems keen but has no Prem experience so he may be a gamble so for me Koeman is first choice with Moyes a close second. Unfortunately I think Koeman will stay where he is because of them qualifying for Europe. Moyes did a great job for us on a shoe-string. He only left us because the biggest job in the Prem was offered (who'd say no) ! He made some shrewd buys and we played good solid footy under him. With more funds available he could correct what RM screwed up (quickly) and finish what he started. My only reservation is that he didn't spend too well when he had money and may not be the big name Mgr some players look for . but Overmars as our DoF would help overcome that. Moyes doesn't deserve the bad press he's getting, he's the best Mgr we've had in a generation. He did a comparable job to LVG at Utd (poison chalice job after Fergie) and saved Real Soc from relegation . If Koeman isn't interested then I say bring Moyes back.

Agree4 Disagree1

25 May 2016 23:45:11
Stop listening to the rags who print sh*t for money.

Agree2 Disagree0

26 May 2016 06:24:44
Seriously who reads or even takes notice of 'The Star' 'Guardian' 'The Sun (pass the sick bag) ', oh and even 'The Mirror' all political/ sensationalist rags. Convinced our next Manager is one of two and we know who they are. This fella we have as a Boss now is nobody's fool and like most of his ilk he surrounds himself with very clever astute advisors and experts in their particular field, why should he suddenly change and turn himself into some sort of SOHO magnate/ showman who shoots from the hip.

Agree2 Disagree0

25 May 2016 11:50:52
isn't going to be moyes isn't it Ed? he's getting spoke about more and more and we all no it will happen, like it or not.

Believable4 Unbelievable6

{Ed025's Note - if it is him then im finished with the club Bman..

25 May 2016 17:36:57
Don't believe everything you read in the rags or what they spout on Talkshite.
They don't know jacks hit.

Everton are doing it the right way. Candidates have and will be interviewed.

Have patience.

Agree6 Disagree1

25 May 2016 17:57:41
Who's the alternative fdb who wants any job going stinks a bit that just wants a peek job not necessarily the Everton job doesn't care just a stepping stone, pellagrine? Can't defend can't spend money, couldn't win the prem this year. Moyes ok he tried somethin new it didn't work but at least he knows hot to galvanise a team, how to defend and had our most successful team in a long time and was the reason for martinez's first season a bit of money and it could be the right place for him and us but getting on a potential managers back before he comes isn't great. If he comes in we know how he operates so he wanted some of evertons players at Utd says a lot about what he thought of them and how good he knows they were. If he comes back got to give him a chance like any other manager.

Agree3 Disagree3

25 May 2016 18:13:12
The problem is Lance its the only way you get any info mate is from the rags or twitter? just get a TAXI FOR KENWRIGHT please.

Agree4 Disagree1

25 May 2016 19:36:43
Ed when Pellegrini was at city did he have total control of transfers or was he just the coach he seems by some to get a bit of stick for city's siginings especially there defensive siginings mangala in particular.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - no, he never had full control of the signings there.}

25 May 2016 00:26:14
Apparently Chelsea have WARNED Everton they will not be held to ransom and are not prepared to pay £65 million for Lukaku and will look elsewhere if we are not prepared to negotiate. I'm sure Lukaku will be off this summer but it should be on our terms and if that is the price Everton feel he is worth in today's market then I would say we hold all the cards hope the board hold their nerve over this one.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

25 May 2016 02:56:22
He's under contract we have nothing to loose. It's like the felani situation. They will panic spend as the window ticks along.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 May 2016 06:01:14
They made a profit on a player they wanted to leave when we bought him so we surely can set a price on the same player who we want to keep.

What arrogance if true.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed091's Note - £65 million will never come in for Lukaku

25 May 2016 07:08:15
I reckon he will go for 48 million Ed/ Blues, to be honest that's a good price as hardly worth 65 million, then again he has 3 years left so we could just tell him to stfu and sell him next year.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 May 2016 07:39:53
Mourinho never sold to a team in the same league, we should do the same, send him abroad!

Agree0 Disagree2

25 May 2016 08:04:47
Mourinho sold him to us? We in a different league?

Agree2 Disagree0

25 May 2016 08:34:23
If Sterling is worth £90m the Lukaku is definitely worth £65m. Stupid amounts but that is the going rate. So they either pay what we want or we do what WBA did with Berahino and play him when it suits us. Good talent but nowhere near as good as he thinks he is - maybe daddy would enjoy watching him in the U.21's.

Agree0 Disagree2

25 May 2016 09:06:34
It's a difficult situation regarding Lukaku. Everton I assume don't want to sell and have him under contract, as others have said the club have the say.

Lukaku says he wants to leave, that to me is a verbal transfer request and should be treated in the same way as a written request. That would bring more integrity to players dealings.
If the club stand firm and say he is for sale at our price only and no one is prepared to pay it, then he stays next season.

Will the club get the best out of a player who wants to leave, or will he sulk and put performances in like the last few months gone.

Personally the club should wait to see if any other club than Chelsea make an offer.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 May 2016 09:16:30
Thought Sterling was 50 million.

Agree3 Disagree0

25 May 2016 09:35:26
Well he won't be going to Chelsea then, thing is if he stamps his feet and says I want to go to Chelsea, if they've put in a substantially lower offer in then just say well it's either another team or you're staying here for another 3 years and see what he does, he'll be off to PSG before you know it. It's not like we don't have any say! .

Agree2 Disagree0

25 May 2016 13:35:15
Also Sterling is English so that inflated his price.

I would be surprised if we got 65 million for Lukaku. Think he'll go for between 45 and 50 million.

Agree2 Disagree0

25 May 2016 14:07:04
Rom is not English. But he is home grown player.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 May 2016 14:14:24
Let him whinge. the board should tell him, his agent and his father, that unless we get 65 mill, or he buys his contract out, then he will be playing for efc next season. if they still whinge, then tell him that rhino is his new manager and to score as many goals for the u21s as he can.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 May 2016 14:30:02
But we are prepared to negotiate start at 80 million and we'll negotiate to 65.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 May 2016 13:57:49
I might be wrong but i thought rom qualified as a home grown player. If that's the case that will boost his price tag some.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 May 2016 14:57:32
if it were my say then he won't be going anywhere for 12 months, even if he barely kicks a ball in that time we won't lose too much on our investment

(we need to remember that's what he and stones are, investments)

we sell he to Chelsea or another premier league club in the summer and he'll come back to hurt us but wait a year and get some stability in the team and hopefully climb the table then we sell when we can attract his replacement.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 May 2016 06:36:55
ed091 irrelevant speculating then isn't it, particularly if we are adamant that is what Lukaku is worth to us. 3 years left on his contract, he and his Dad should keep their gobs shut.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent