29 May 2014 15:45:42
Rumours of David Villa going to join New York City FC, would anybody take him for a season if available?I know I would!
29 May 2014 16:26:53
id take ronaldo for a season, doesn't mean it will happenl same with villa, dreamland
Use our rumours form to send us everton transfer rumours.
29 May 2014 15:45:42
Rumours of David Villa going to join New York City FC, would anybody take him for a season if available?I know I would!
29 May 2014 16:26:53
id take ronaldo for a season, doesn't mean it will happenl same with villa, dreamland
29 May 2014 11:40:52
What would everyone prefer this summer
1- lukaku only big signing the rest frees or loans
2- no lukaku but we still spend 25-30m on 3-4 players plus loans and frees
Personally I think lukaku is good enough and has enough potential for us to put everything we have towards him.
29 May 2014 13:55:28
neither
Option 2 by a country mile.
Our squad is nowhere near strong enough just for Lukaku to be added to it.
I wouldn't buy Lukaku anyway, flattered to deceive last season.
I don' think we have only 25m Quinny. At least 40 m. Just guess.
29 May 2014 11:56:15
Talking to some mates from the red side and had to laugh. They're all up in arms that spurs are trying to hijack their Llanana bid, going on about we saw him first and no honour in football anymore. They really are as two faced as they come.
29 May 2014 11:31:28
Jordi Gomez on a free would you have him?
Depends on his wages
No thankyou
29 May 2014 10:27:21
Lukaku has scored more goals by the age of 21 than. Aguero, van persie, suarez, falcao, costa and a whole host of other top top strikers. He is headed for the top I just know he is.
29 May 2014 09:19:53
Its all down to the money guys. We need a bigger squad and can't afford Lukaku who would use up all the budget. Only a loan deal would do unless we sold Barkley. I would fancy Bolasie, Snodgrass and Wellbeck/Ba with a similar budget. Fer if Barry is not coming back.
Yeah but Lukaku is quality and Welbeck/ba/bolaise aren't. Snodgrass is good but we're reasonably stocked for people to play behind the striker.
29 May 2014 13:57:25
id rather have lukaku than welbeck (not a footballer just an athlete), ba (rubbish) and snodgrass (what does he do again?)
Would defo have Lukaku he has the potential of 20+ goals unlike Welbad
29 May 2014 08:17:38
Just gone on EFC site which is running an item on Lukaku /Belgium and the World Cup. Just asking the question if we didn't have a chance of signing him would the blues be running this?
Lukaku enjoyed his stay at Everton with Martinez in charge. I like him but will blow our whole budget. I reckon Bolasie, Wellbeck, Snodgrass will be a better call for less money. If we cash in on Barkley then Lukaku would not be a problem. He wants to play all the time which makes a difference.
Its running it because technically he is still ours until the end of June. Nothing more nothing less matey
Also, Smeggs, do u know what our budget is mate?
How do you know that buying Lukaku will blow our whole transfer budget? We may have more than people realise alternatively we may have less than people hope for. IMO even an educated guess may be far from the mark. All I hope is that Robbie gets the targets he is after and we start the new season campaign with squad he is happy with.