02 Aug 2016 20:17:46
loic remy and 60 million is the word at mo.


1.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 20:37:45
Remy is past his sell by date but please just get rid of rom he will drag us down untill he gets what he wants i can't be arsed watching him throwing his arms up in the air blaming everbody because he has a poor touch yes we will miss his goals but the team is more important.


2.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 20:39:24
What makes them think we want one of there rejects in Remy who never really played last year and injury prone just so they can get his wages of the bill if we rejected bone from city who is ten times better than Remy why the hell they think we going to say yes to them let's just tell them to get stuffed pay full amount or do one.


3.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 20:44:53
Take the deal to put an end to it the world will see rom on the big stage and realise we have ripped chelsea off not only did we get him on loan for a year am dam sure we have not paid anywhere near the 28m we got him for back to chelsea so i reckon out the 3 years we have probably spent 15m on him with the rest still owed to chelsea so nice tidy profit on a avg player . if he stays i will not boo him or cheer him but just like the way he goes about his busines.


4.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 20:50:26
Spot on konehed.


5.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 21:06:52
60 Mill plus Costa.


6.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 21:11:36
Remy is a proven finisher. he's not got a sniff at Chelsea, but when he plays week in week out, like Marseille and Newcastle he bags goals.

Pace, direct, great finishing ability - for 10 mill in the current market, id take that all day.


7.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 21:45:59
60 million for Lukaku and to get Remy on top is just obscene. No brainier if it's true. We will need 3-4 attackers next season if RK goes two up. Who wants Kone?
Get Remy and Bony to start .


8.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 21:48:59
I would take remy and 60 mil anyday if lukaku wants out let him go chelsea are not even in europe anyway.


9.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 23:11:18
Too injury prone what's the point in having a striker who may barely feature?
If we're going to do a swap deal take 35m and Bony for Stones, hold out for 70 for Rom.


10.) 02 Aug 2016
02 Aug 2016 23:24:22
I'd take 60m and remy and invest some cash in haller and rolan.


11.) 03 Aug 2016
03 Aug 2016 01:50:55
tell me one time a transfare like this player plus cash has ever worked or been done

only in the minds of (sports writers ) for daily bullshit papers I think they play far to much FM and even in that game its a ****ing nightmare to get them done

rom will be sold for £71.47m or 85m euros.


12.) 03 Aug 2016
03 Aug 2016 06:20:59
Hahaha dream on thinking Costa would ever join you! Agreed though lads you absolutely do not want Remy, he was born offside! Knows where the net is though so I guess he wouldn't be a bad backup for you.


13.) 03 Aug 2016
03 Aug 2016 06:51:20
Chelsea fan - Just as a reply to you 'andygeryslovechild', A perfect example of where a player plus cash swap deal has happened and worked would be Ashley Cole for William Gallas. There are plenty of other deals that have been player plus cash too so I don't really know why you think it would be such a ludicrous offer. However I do agree with the majority of you that it would be more beneficial for you to receive the full amount in money rather that getting Remy as an additive.


14.) 03 Aug 2016
03 Aug 2016 07:52:33
Did Ashley Cole not run down his deal at Arsenal before moving to Chelsea?


15.) 03 Aug 2016
03 Aug 2016 08:44:37
Remy is a proven class finisher. Everyone says he is injury prone but so was Saha before he come here and he was great for us.


16.) 03 Aug 2016
03 Aug 2016 10:36:12
This rumour 100% won't happen anyway. I'm quite sure we'll just cash in with no other players changing clubs. Why would we want Loic Remy or Diego Costa? Remy had half a good season with Newcastle and was a complete waste of money and Diego Costas a liability, don't like him as a man and although he's good I don't like him as a player. I'd personally hate if he come anywhere near the club, he thinks he owns the football pitch. Blokes a muppet. On the other hand I think we should bid for Bergovic (spelling) He'd be a great no1. We'll just double our money on Lukaku thanks and buy elsewhere.


17.) 03 Aug 2016
03 Aug 2016 16:10:37
I'd take 55m plus begovic and remy.


18.) 03 Aug 2016
03 Aug 2016 17:55:57
well cech118 both teams wanted the others players yous did not want to let WG go but had to in the end behind the mangers back witch went down well

tell me were in any paper rag or internet talk have everton ever looked at signing remy this is a clear bull paper talk way of trying to get papers sold

yous have not bid for ROM as of yet in anyway shape or form and will not be bidding for him till Costa in for sure going then yous will be in for a hard time not meeting the £75m we are holding out for the ball is with everton on this deal as yous cannot go into the start of the new season without I proven goal scorer in the perm 20 goal a season players don't come cheap anymore for so called top 4 teams

yous have 72 players before going into under 23 team 72 and only one proven goal scorer in the perm and he is looking to leave

do you see now that we have yous over a barrel on this

yes yous could go out and buy some other player but again would they be proven 20 goal a season players in the perm I don't think so

anyway you keep the dream alive.


19.) 04 Aug 2016
04 Aug 2016 00:07:48
Just to add to the player swap debate. Eto'o and ibrahimovic were involved in a cash+player swap deal. Looks like Spuds move for nkoudou will involve n'jie even if it's just on loan.

Personally I don't think we should be going for Lukaku. There's about at least 10 strikers if not more that I'd prefer.
Chelsea have also proven over the last few seasons we'll no longer pay over the odds for players, so don't think you'll be holding us over the barrel any time soon.