07 Sep 2014 10:56:45
Morning all, don't hear many rumours but like to share what I do hear, this is in relation to the Henan deal, now every man and his dog knows that there was a third party involved in this transfer, however what I'm hearing is that we didn't have a problem per say with the asking price but we did with the ownership rights, we apparently smelled a rat in regards to the 'third parties' disclosure of who had percentage rights to Henan, and we didn't what another 'Tevez' debacle with someone else claiming percentage after the deal had gone through. The premier has the strongest rules and regulations in regards 3rd party ownership and penalties and thus he's gone to Olympiacos for a year as any 'extra' ownership claims will have to be declared before a further transfer!

IBWT

We have a 50 mill striker anyway in big Steven Naismith, its a rumour site guys I wouldn't worry COYB

If a 3rd party is a problem and against the rules. why can teams loan players, as a loan player has a 3rd party in the club that is Loaning him out. as you have to pay the player his wage and the loaning team a fee, so there you have a 3rd party involved (strange)